How Have Reusable Rockets Changed the Cost of Reaching Space?

By Adam Patti, Chief Executive Officer, VistaShares | Published November 13, 2026

Reusable rockets have lowered the cost of putting payloads into low Earth orbit from about $54,500 per kilogram on the Space Shuttle to roughly $2,700 per kilogram on a commercial reusable rocket, according to NASA analysis, a reduction of about 95%. Reuse works by landing and reflying the most expensive part of a rocket, its first-stage booster, instead of discarding it after each flight. Cheaper, more frequent launches have made large satellite constellations, commercial space stations and new national security programs economically possible.

Why were launches so expensive for so long?

For most of the space age, rockets were used once. Every launch meant building a new vehicle, including engines, tanks and avionics, and then dropping it into the ocean. The Space Shuttle was partly reusable, but refurbishing the orbiter and its boosters between flights was so costly that it did not lower costs as hoped.

A NASA Ames Research Center analysis estimated that the Space Shuttle cost about $1.5 billion per launch to place 27,500 kilograms in low Earth orbit, about $54,500 per kilogram.¹ The Center for Strategic and International Studies, which compiles launch cost data, found that per-kilogram costs in then-year dollars generally rose from 1957 to 2005 before declining from 2005 to 2020.²

How does reusability lower costs?

Recovering the booster. The first stage accounts for much of a rocket’s cost. Landing it on a pad or ship allows it to fly again after inspection and refurbishment.

Spreading costs over many flights. Engines, structures and avionics are reused, so their cost is divided across many missions.

Recovering other parts. Some operators also recover the payload fairing, the nose cone that covers satellites during ascent.

High cadence. Flying frequently keeps factories, launch pads and crews busy, lowering fixed costs per launch.

In-house manufacturing. Building engines and components in-house can reduce supplier markups and speed design changes.

The same NASA analysis found that a commercial reusable rocket advertised a price of $62 million to launch 22,800 kilograms to low Earth orbit, about $2,720 per kilogram, a 20-fold reduction from the Shuttle, and that a heavy-lift variant lowered the figure to about $1,400 per kilogram.¹

How has launch activity changed?

Lower prices have been accompanied by much higher launch volumes. The Space Foundation counted about 321 orbital launch attempts worldwide in 2025.³ A large share of these carried batches of broadband satellites, which would have been uneconomic at earlier prices. Our article on low Earth orbit satellite broadband explains how constellations depend on frequent launches.

What comes next?

Several developers are working on fully reusable vehicles, in which both the booster and the upper stage return for reuse. Their stated goals include costs per kilogram far below today’s levels, sometimes cited in the range of $100 per kilogram or less. These are design targets, not achieved prices, and reaching them depends on reliable rapid reuse, high flight rates and successful development of very large vehicles. Other companies are developing medium-lift reusable rockets that could add competition.

Why does launch cost matter for the space economy?

Launch is only a small part of total space spending, but it is a gateway. When launch is expensive, satellites must be built to last for decades and are engineered to minimize risk, which raises their cost. When launch is cheaper and frequent, operators can build smaller, less expensive satellites, replace them more often and update technology faster.

The Space Foundation estimated the global space economy at about $686 billion in 2025, with commercial activity making up about 79%.³ Cheaper launch supports many parts of that total, including broadband constellations, Earth observation, navigation and government programs. Our article on what is the space economy describes its main segments.

How does launch cost affect government programs?

Governments are among the biggest buyers of launch services. Lower prices let defense and civil agencies field proliferated constellations of smaller satellites rather than a few large ones, which can make networks more resilient because losing one satellite matters less. NASA has also shifted toward buying services from commercial providers, such as cargo and crew transport to the International Space Station, rather than owning and operating vehicles itself. The same NASA analysis estimated that commercial cargo service lowered the cost of delivering cargo to the station by about a factor of four compared with the Space Shuttle.¹

What are the risks?

Concentration. A single provider performs a large share of global commercial launches, which creates dependence for customers and governments.

Development risk. New vehicles can face delays, test failures and cost overruns.

Regulation and range capacity. Launch licensing, environmental reviews and limited launch sites can constrain growth.

Orbital congestion. More satellites raise collision risk and the need for traffic management.

Pricing. Lower costs do not always translate into lower prices for customers, depending on competition.

What does this mean for investors?

Launch costs affect satellite manufacturers, operators, component suppliers and the government programs that buy launch services. Many launch companies are private, so public market exposure often comes through satellite operators, aerospace and defense firms, component makers and companies that supply engines or materials. Our articles on the satellite supply chain and how to evaluate a thematic ETF offer related context.

Frequently asked questions

How much does it cost to launch a satellite?

It depends on the satellite’s mass, its destination orbit and whether it shares a rocket with other payloads. A dedicated commercial launch to low Earth orbit has been advertised at tens of millions of dollars. Small satellites can buy space on rideshare missions, where list prices have been quoted per kilogram. Higher orbits, such as geostationary orbit, cost more per kilogram.

What makes a rocket reusable?

A reusable rocket is designed so that major components, usually the first-stage booster, can return to Earth intact and fly again. Boosters typically relight their engines to slow down and land on a pad or a floating platform. After inspection and refurbishment, the booster is prepared for another mission. Some designs also aim to recover upper stages.

How many times can a booster fly?

Individual boosters have been flown dozens of times. The practical limit depends on wear on engines and structures, refurbishment costs and the risk tolerance of customers. Operators typically inspect boosters after each flight and replace components as needed. Fleet leaders have reflown boosters far more often than early estimates suggested when reuse began.

Why did launch costs per kilogram rise before 2005?

Analyses such as the CSIS launch cost data repository found that costs in then-year dollars generally increased from 1957 to 2005. Factors included inflation, low launch rates, expendable vehicle designs, government cost-plus contracting and limited competition. The arrival of commercial providers using new designs and fixed-price contracts contributed to the decline after 2005.

Does cheaper launch make satellites cheaper?

Often, yes. When launch is costly, satellites are engineered for very long lives and maximum reliability, which raises their cost. Cheaper and more frequent launch lets operators build smaller satellites with shorter lives, replace them more often and accept more design risk. That approach has lowered costs for some applications, especially broadband and Earth observation.

How do thematic ETFs provide space exposure?

Space-themed ETFs typically hold satellite operators, aerospace and defense manufacturers, component suppliers and companies providing space-based data or communications. Many launch providers remain privately held, so direct launch exposure in public markets is limited. Reviewing a fund’s holdings and revenue mix shows how much of its portfolio is tied to space activities versus broader aerospace.

Cite this page: Adam Patti, "How Have Reusable Rockets Changed the Cost of Reaching Space?," VistaShares, updated November 13, 2026, https://www.vistashares.com/reusable-rockets-launch-costs/. Plain-text version.

This material is provided for educational purposes only. It is not investment, legal or tax advice, and it is not a recommendation or an offer to buy or sell any security. Information is drawn from sources believed to be reliable as of the date of publication, is not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness, and may change without notice. Figures attributed to third parties are their estimates. Projections and forecasts are not guarantees of future results. Investors should consult their own financial, legal and tax professionals before making investment decisions. Investments involve risk, including possible loss of principal. Companies in a single industry or theme may be affected by common economic, regulatory or technological developments and may be more volatile than the broad market. References to companies, governments or programs are for illustration only.